VMFS Recovery™
Recover data from damaged or formatted VMFS disks or VMDK files
Recover data from damaged or formatted VMFS disks or VMDK files
Last updated: Apr 16, 2024

Virtual servers vs. physical servers: Pros and Cons

Whether physical, virtual, or cloud-based, a server is the heartbeat of any IT infrastructure. When the server is down, the apps and installation on the platforms or devices connected to the server would be instantly inaccessible. That said, it is important to note the difference between a physical server and a virtual server, so you can understand the benefits you stand to gain from using either of them. That is what this article seeks to unveil.

Here you will find out:

  • what a physical server is and what a virtual server is
  • benefits and disadvantages of physical and virtual servers
  • how DiskInternals software can help you

Are you ready? Let's read!

Using a physical server or a virtual server

Your organization's infrastructure can use a physical server or a virtual server. But which server should you choose? Of course, it is imperative that the selected server handle your workload robustly without even minimal interruption. After all, even a couple of minutes of downtime can cost you a lot. Thus, first you need to study all the subtleties of each of the servers, determine the main advantages and disadvantages of a physical server and a virtual server, and only then make the appropriate conclusion. So let's get down to exploring the differences between a virtual server and a physical server!

Virtual servers vs. physical servers: What are the differences?

FeatureVirtual ServersPhysical Servers
ResourcesShare hardware resources with other virtual machines on the same host.Dedicated hardware resources, which can lead to higher performance.
CostGenerally more cost-effective as multiple virtual servers can be hosted on a single physical machine.More expensive due to the costs of hardware, maintenance, and physical space.
ScalabilityEasily scalable; can quickly add more resources or adjust as needed without physical changes.Scalability is limited; physical changes and additional hardware are necessary to upgrade.
Setup and MaintenanceEasier to set up and maintain due to management software. Often includes automated backups and updates.Requires physical setup and maintenance, which can be more complex and time-consuming.
Energy EfficiencyMore energy-efficient as one physical server can host multiple virtual servers.Less energy-efficient as each server requires its own power.
Deployment SpeedFaster deployment, as new virtual servers can be spun up in minutes.Deployment can be slower, requiring physical installation and configuration.
SecurityPotential security risks if the hypervisor is compromised; however, isolation can protect against issues affecting other VMs on the same host.Generally considered more secure as they do not share physical resources, though they still face traditional security challenges.
CustomizationHigh level of customization is possible, but dependent on the underlying physical hardware capabilities.Complete hardware customization is possible, tailoring to specific needs.
ReliabilityDepends on the reliability of the host machine; failure can affect multiple VMs.Physical issues can lead to downtime, but only affects one server at a time.

What is a physical server?

A physical server, also known as a dedicated server, is a single computer in a network reserved for serving the needs of the network. For example, some networks require that one computer be set aside to manage communications between all the other computers, or a dedicated server might be used to handle printer resources. Here are some key characteristics of a physical server:

  • Hardware Dedication: A physical server is a standalone hardware unit dedicated to a specific task or set of tasks. It is not shared with any other services or applications outside of what it is explicitly set up to manage.
  • Resource Allocation: All of the CPU, RAM, storage, and network resources of a physical server are allocated to a single tenant or application. This means that the server can be fully optimized for its specific workload, providing better performance in many cases.
  • Control and Security: Physical servers provide a high level of control over hardware and software configurations. Users can implement tailored security measures, making them suitable for sensitive or critical applications requiring dedicated resources and enhanced security.
  • Customization and Scalability: While physical servers can be initially more expensive and less flexible in terms of rapid scaling compared to virtual servers, they offer the potential for extensive customization in terms of hardware specifications, operating systems, and software.
  • Isolation: Since there is no sharing of the physical resources, the risk of interference from other applications or users is minimized. This isolation helps in maintaining stable performance and security.

Pros of Physical Servers

  • High Performance: Physical servers offer dedicated resources which can provide better performance for resource-intensive applications, as there is no overhead from virtualization.
  • Full Control and Customization: Users have complete control over the hardware and software configurations. This allows for precise customization based on specific needs, which is ideal for specialized computing environments.
  • Security and Isolation: Since the server is not shared with others, it offers better security and isolation. This is crucial for handling sensitive data or performing critical operations that require robust security measures.
  • Predictable Performance: Without other tenants to share resources with, the performance of a physical server is more predictable and stable. This reliability is essential for applications where consistent performance is critical.
  • No Resource Contention: There is no competition for resources with other virtual machines, which can be a significant advantage for performance-sensitive applications.

Cons of Physical Servers

  • Higher Costs: Physical servers typically involve higher upfront costs for hardware and setup. Ongoing expenses can also be significant, including power, cooling, and physical space.
  • Less Flexibility: Scaling resources on a physical server can be challenging and slow as it often requires purchasing and installing additional hardware.
  • Maintenance and Downtime: Maintenance can require downtime for the physical server, which can disrupt operations. Upgrading hardware also necessitates physical intervention, which can be time-consuming and costly.
  • Energy Inefficiency: Compared to virtual servers, physical servers can be less energy efficient, especially if they are underutilized but still consuming full power for cooling and operations.
  • Space Requirements: Physical servers require physical space. As more servers are needed, the space required increases, which can be a limitation for expanding businesses.

What is a virtual server?

A virtual server, also known as a virtual machine (VM), is an emulation of a computer system that operates based on the computing architecture of a real physical server. Virtual servers run on shared physical hardware but function as separate, independent servers. Here are the key aspects of virtual servers:

  • Virtualization Technology: Virtual servers are created using software called a hypervisor or virtual machine monitor (VMM), which allows multiple virtual servers to run on a single physical server. The hypervisor allocates physical resources—like CPU, memory, and storage—from the host machine to each virtual server as needed.
  • Resource Allocation: Although they share physical resources, virtual servers can be allocated a fixed amount of resources to handle their tasks. This setup allows for efficient utilization of the underlying physical hardware, maximizing its capabilities.
  • Isolation: Each virtual server operates in isolation from others, even though they share the same physical hardware. This means that the processes running on one virtual server will not affect the performance of another.
  • Scalability and Flexibility: One of the significant advantages of virtual servers is their scalability. Resources can be quickly adjusted based on demand, and new virtual servers can be created and deployed rapidly without the need for physical hardware provisioning.
  • Cost Efficiency: Virtual servers are generally more cost-effective compared to physical servers. They allow businesses to utilize the full potential of their physical hardware, reducing the need for additional physical machines and decreasing the overall cost of ownership.
  • Maintenance and Recovery: Virtual servers facilitate easier backup and recovery processes. Since the server is software-based, backing up and restoring a virtual server can be as simple as copying data and configuration files.

Pros of Virtual Servers

  • Cost Efficiency: Virtual servers reduce physical hardware requirements, leading to significant cost savings on equipment, power, and cooling expenses.
  • Scalability: Resources can be easily scaled up or down depending on demand, without the need to purchase additional physical hardware. This flexibility makes virtual servers ideal for businesses with fluctuating needs.
  • Quick Deployment: Virtual machines can be created, duplicated, and deployed rapidly, which is beneficial for testing environments, scaling operations quickly, and reducing the time to market for new applications.
  • Efficient Resource Utilization: Virtualization allows multiple virtual servers to run on a single physical server, maximizing the utilization of the underlying hardware and reducing wastage.
  • Simplified Management: Management and maintenance of virtual servers can be handled through centralized software tools, which can automate and streamline tasks such as updates, backups, and monitoring.

Cons of Virtual Servers

  • Resource Contention: Since resources are shared among multiple virtual machines on the same physical host, virtual servers might suffer from resource contention if the host is over-provisioned, leading to degraded performance.
  • Security Risks: The hypervisor, which creates and manages virtual machines, becomes a critical point. If compromised, it can affect all virtual servers running on the host.
  • Complexity in Setup and Maintenance: While management is simplified in some aspects, setting up a virtual environment correctly requires careful planning and expertise to avoid performance bottlenecks and security vulnerabilities.
  • Dependency on Host Machine: All virtual machines depend on the health of the host machine. If the physical server experiences issues, it can impact all virtual servers operating on that host.
  • Performance Overhead: Virtual servers introduce a small performance overhead due to the additional layer of abstraction provided by the hypervisor. For extremely high-performance needs, this could be a limiting factor.

Making your decision on physical vs. virtual servers

Deciding between physical and virtual servers depends largely on your specific business needs, budget, and future growth expectations. Here are some key factors to consider to help make your decision:

1. Assess Your Performance Needs

  • Physical Servers: Opt for a physical server if your applications require high computational power and dedicated resources without the overhead of virtualization. This is particularly important for performance-sensitive tasks such as large database management or intensive data processing.
  • Virtual Servers: Choose virtual servers if your applications can tolerate a slight overhead and do not require the maximum hardware capabilities. Virtual servers are ideal for less resource-intensive applications and services that benefit from quick scalability.

2. Consider Your Budget

  • Physical Servers: These involve higher upfront costs due to the need for purchasing hardware, setting up the server, and managing physical space. Ongoing costs include power, cooling, and maintenance.
  • Virtual Servers: Virtual servers generally have lower upfront costs since multiple virtual environments can run on a single physical server. Operational costs are also reduced due to better hardware utilization and energy efficiency.

3. Evaluate Scalability Requirements

  • Physical Servers: Scaling involves purchasing additional hardware and can be time-consuming. If you anticipate needing rapid or frequent scaling, physical servers might not be the best choice.
  • Virtual Servers: If you require the ability to scale quickly or adjust resources based on fluctuating demands, virtual servers offer a much more flexible and efficient solution.

4. Review Management and Maintenance Capabilities

  • Physical Servers: Consider whether you have the in-house expertise and resources to manage physical servers, which require ongoing maintenance and hands-on management.
  • Virtual Servers: Virtual server management can often be more straightforward and less resource-intensive, thanks to management software that can automate many tasks such as backups, updates, and resource allocation.

5. Analyze Security and Compliance Needs

  • Physical Servers: If you are in an industry that requires stringent security controls or compliance with regulations that mandate physical isolation of data, physical servers might be necessary.
  • Virtual Servers: Virtual servers offer robust security features, but sharing a physical host can introduce risks if not properly managed. Ensure your virtual environment supports the necessary security measures.

6. Future-Proofing Your Infrastructure

  • Physical Servers: Consider whether investing in physical servers aligns with long-term business goals, especially in an era where cloud computing and virtualization are becoming dominant.
  • Virtual Servers: If you aim to keep your IT infrastructure flexible and aligned with modern practices, virtual servers might be more appropriate.

Virtual Machine vs. Server—Same or Different?

The terms "Virtual Machine" (VM) and "Server" can sometimes be used interchangeably, but they refer to different concepts in the context of computing environments. Understanding the difference is crucial for effectively managing IT resources and making informed decisions about infrastructure. Here’s a detailed look at how they differ:

Virtual Machine (VM)

A Virtual Machine is a software-based emulation of a computer system that runs an operating system and applications just like a physical computer. It behaves independently and can be hosted on a physical server where multiple virtual machines might share the underlying physical resources. Here are some key points about virtual machines:

  • Isolation: Each VM operates in isolation from others even though they share the same physical hardware.
  • Multiple Instances: Multiple VMs can run on a single physical server, allowing for efficient utilization of resources.
  • Flexibility and Scalability: VMs offer high flexibility; they can be easily created, modified, duplicated, and relocated across different host machines.
  • Use Case: Ideal for testing environments, scalable web applications, and situations where several operating systems need to run concurrently on the same hardware.

Server

A Server can refer to either a physical server or a virtual server, but fundamentally, it is a system that provides resources, data, services, or programs to other computers, known as clients, over a network. Here’s more on servers:

  • Hardware and Software: A physical server involves actual hardware dedicated to specific server tasks, whereas a virtual server is a partitioned part of a physical server that acts like a separate server.
  • Dedicated Resources: In the context of a physical server, it has dedicated resources such as CPU, memory, and storage. Virtual servers allocated a portion of these resources from the host machine.
  • Role in Network: Servers play a critical role in networks, handling tasks like hosting web pages, managing email and database services, and storing files, among others.
  • Use Case: Used in both small businesses and large data centers, servers are essential for data management, application hosting, and delivering services to client devices.

Key Differences

  • Nature: A VM is purely software and an abstraction of a physical machine, whereas a server can be either a tangible physical entity or a virtual entity depending on the context.
  • Purpose: VMs are used to emulate computer systems within a controlled software environment, allowing multiple operating systems to run on one physical server. Servers are used to provide services and manage network resources, regardless of whether they are physical or virtual.

Conclusion

In conclusion, understanding the differences between physical servers, virtual machines, and the broader concept of servers is essential for making informed decisions about your IT infrastructure. Here's a summary of key points to consider:

  1. Physical Servers offer dedicated resources and are best suited for high-performance tasks where resource allocation needs to be predictable and secure. They require significant investment in hardware and maintenance but provide robust control over configurations.
  2. Virtual Machines provide a flexible and cost-effective solution by emulating physical computers on a single physical server. This setup allows for efficient use of resources, quick scalability, and the ability to run multiple operating systems simultaneously, making it ideal for dynamic and growing environments.
  3. Servers, whether physical or virtual, serve as the backbone of network operations by managing and providing resources, data, and services to client machines. The choice between using a physical server or a virtual server largely depends on the specific needs of the business, such as security requirements, budget constraints, and scalability needs.
  4. Decision-Making should consider both immediate and long-term IT requirements. Physical servers might be necessary for heavy-duty operations with specific security or performance needs, whereas virtual servers offer greater flexibility and cost efficiency for businesses looking to expand and adapt quickly.

By leveraging the strengths of both physical servers and virtual machines, organizations can design a resilient, efficient, and scalable IT infrastructure. Whether you opt for the tangible solidity of physical servers, the agile efficiency of virtual machines, or a hybrid approach, the choice should align with your strategic business objectives and operational demands. Understanding these concepts allows businesses to optimize their resources and better prepare for future growth and technological advancements.

If you need to recover information from VMFS-formatted drives

DiskInternals VMFS Recovery is an application that helps you recover hopelessly lost files from VMFS-formatted drives, as well as snapshots from damaged or failed virtual disks. This program automatically checks the status of VMware datastores and VMFS volumes, then reads VMFS structures where possible. All found and recovered data can be previewed for free using the Preview option. If you are not confident in your abilities or want to play it safe, simply use the Recovery Wizard and follow its instructions until the end of the process.

Detailed instructions for DiskInternals VMFS Recovery are below:

  • Install the application, open it and connect via SSH.
  • Then left-click to open the disk and activate the scanning process (full or fast).
  • Select the required VMDK files and mount them for free viewing later.
  • You will need a DiskInternals VMFS Recovery license on the company's website to export data. Buy it and you will be provided with a unique license key and full access to the recovered files.

Related articles

FREE DOWNLOADVer 4.23, WinBUY NOWFrom $699

Please rate this article.
52 reviews